Skip to next element

25% off Rain & Wind Collection | Code F25RW25 | Shop Now Details

Free Shipping On Orders $100+

Back to Blog
Where Have All the Women’s Bikes Gone?

Where Have All the Women’s Bikes Gone?

Based on a quick review of bike manufacturers’ websites, women’s bikes don’t seem to have gone anywhere, but a little probing shows the industry might to be in retrograde mode. Having made so much progress in the last 25 years, it would be a shame to lose sight of the goal: bountiful offerings for all riders.  Although there are more choices than ever for female cyclists, the true distinctions between those bikes and unisex bikes are disappearing quickly.  

Last month, Bicycling magazine’s annual Buyer’s Guide hit the news stands and for the first time in years, there was no mention of women’s bikes.  Poof! Gone with the wind! I haven’t been able to find the reason for this -- so far, all Bicycling will say is women’s bikes will be covered in their Editor’s Choice and in individual bike reviews.  Gone, but not forgotten. Now, add to this the fact that, with the notable exception of Specialized, in the past most smaller women’s bikes have offered 650c wheel sizes to fit the rider properly. (At Terry, we go a step further with not only 650c and 700c, but 24” wheels as well.)  But recently, 650c has been disappearing from the lineup faster than real sugar in soft drinks. 

No more 650c for Cannondale, Trek, Orbea or Fuji to name just a few. So what’s going on??? I spoke to some manufacturers -- those who continue to carry 650c and those who have dropped them. They all told me the same thing. 650c wheels are a must-have for a properly built small bicycle. But there is mounting pressure to build small bikes with 700c wheels. Some told me the consumer herself is driving this change. Apparently there are quite a few women who would prefer to ride an ill-fitting bike with 700c wheels than a properly-fitting 650c bicycle. This may be driven by hesitancy about the availability of 650c or the need to conform. 

Others think the “push back” is from those dealers who don’t really understand how a 650c wheel makes a difference in bike fit and choose to stay in the 700c comfort zone rather than educate the consumer. Once a manufacturer has decided to embrace 700c wheels exclusively, just how will women’s bikes be differentiated from “unisex” bikes?  Expect to see a lot more of this: “...a shorter crank and stem length, along with narrower handlebars, give it a women-specific fit”.  Gee, that’s just what we did in the good old days of unisex! I can guarantee you that women on the tail of the bell curve, i.e. those very petite women are in for a rough time of it.  As 700c returns, stand over heights are rising. Are manufacturers really reading the market correctly? Is there indeed a trade-off between the desire for a properly fitting bicycle and wheel size? What say you, dear reader?  

Share:

24 Comments

Priscilla Ireland

October 30, 2025 at 12:35pm

I think we women aren’t vocal enough. Our bike shops as does our outdoor shop cater to men mainly with a few items for women. I have asked our bike shops, our Tri shop, and our outdoor store what they have for women and it is probably only 1/4 of what they have to offer. All of their rides are geared to men as evidenced by distance and speed and they have not been receptive to something different. According to them its because there is no call for it however our women’s only tri is limited to 850 and is sold out within minutes!! I think this shows that if its geared to women we will participate. If its made specifically for us we will buy -we women do have money.
Thanks for letting me spout of

Sharon

October 30, 2025 at 12:35pm

Sigh… we smaller women (5’3" and under) are just not educating ourselves enough. Therefore we let ourselves be talked into what will make us a ‘better cyclist’, usually by someone with ONLY a vested interest in making a sale. Maybe being a scientist helps in my case (i.e. the ridiculous myth that 700c wheels are “faster”? Really??) At 5’0", there’s a reason I’m the proud owner of two 16" Terry’s — 24" front wheel and all. My bikes take me as far and as fast as I will ever want to go. And when I get where I’m going, whether it’s 10 miles or 100 miles away, I can still feel my fingers and neck. Imagine that!

Tabatha smith

October 30, 2025 at 12:35pm

Wow, interesting article. I didn’t even know they made 650c tires. I am used to riding a 52cm bike with 700c bike but I have put women specific handlebars and smalller cranks on it and that helps. But then I am a little taller than the average girl at 5’6" . I can see how a lower standover would be helpful for small women in particular.

Kim Corcoran

October 30, 2025 at 12:35pm

It isn’t just size, but also drive train. Too often (it seems to me) drive trains are designed exclusively for young adults (mostly male young adults) and don’t provide gearing that will allow comfortable riding in hilly terrain for smaller, or older, or “not testosterone enhanced” people. Too often, I’ve stuggled to convince bike shops that I want smaller chainrings/bigger cogs (at least 34 teeth, thank you very much). We shouldn’t have to walk our bikes up steep hills for lack of easy enough gearing.

« Previous 1 3 4 5

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with